Unlocking the sperm's internal compass

E ven without GPS units to guide them to the egg, sperm perform some impressive navigational feats. Kashikar et al. reveal several responses that enable sperm to get their bearings and steer to the egg (1). A sperm tracks down the egg by following a gradient of chemical attractants. In the sea urchin species Arbacia punctulata, the attractant is the peptide resact, which sticks to receptors on the sperm’s fl agellum and triggers an infl ux of calcium (2). Sperm set their course based on these calcium surges (3). For example, a recent study by the team found that the rate of change in calcium levels dictates whether sea urchin sperm make sharp or gentle turns (4). By continually “sniffi ng” its surroundings and recalibrating its course, a sperm follows a circuitous path to the egg. But many of the details of how sperm navigate using resact levels remain mysterious. Researchers don’t know, for example, how long a sperm samples its surroundings before heading in a particular direction or how it adjusts its sensitivity to concentrations of attractant that can vary by orders of magnitude. Kashikar et al. set up experiments to answer questions like these. They exposed sea urchin sperm to caged versions of resact and cyclic GMP—which spurs calcium surges—that they could free with fl ashes of light. In this way they could stimulate the sperm at specifi c time intervals. The fi rst question the researchers tried to answer was how long the sperm samples its surroundings. The team compared responses to a single full-strength fl ash and two half-strength fl ashes delivered varying times apart. The results suggest that a sperm tests its environment for between 0.2 and 0.6 seconds, integrating the stimuli it receives in that time and then computing its direction. But what if another stimulus arrives after a sperm has already begun to respond? The researchers thought they knew the answer: the sperm would ignore late-arriving stimuli or add them to previous ones. Instead, the team showed that a pulse of resact or cyclic GMP one second after the original stimulus—when the calcium infl ux was at its peak—caused the sperm to reset. The calcium surge fi zzled, and a new one began. When the researchers tracked the swimming paths of the sperm, they discovered that plunging calcium levels caused the cells to stay on a straight path for a longer period of time. The sperm then turned as calcium levels began to rise after the second stimulus. By altering the concentration of caged resact and the strength of the light pulse, Kashikar et al. determined that a sperm can detect and count single molecules of the attractant. But that fi nding raises a question: as the sperm approaches the egg, resact’s concentration soars, so why aren’t the resact receptors swamped at close range? To fi nd out, the researchers added resact to solutions with different background levels of the attractant. Results of these experiments suggest that sperm reduce their sensitivity as the background concentration increases, probably by tweaking the resact receptor. The scientists tested that possibility by prodding sperm with cyclic GMP, which stimulates the cells without activating resact receptors. That procedure spurred less desensitization, supporting the notion that sperm somehow dull the responsiveness of their resact receptors as the concentration of the attractant rises. “We identifi ed the different computational steps that sperm perform in order to navigate successfully,” says senior author U. Benjamin Kaupp. By sampling their surroundings, remaining responsive to latearriving stimuli, and adjusting their sensitivity as they near their target, sperm can home in on an egg that is 4.7 millimeters away, or about 100 times their length. Among the questions researchers still need to answer are how sperm adjust the sensitivity of their resact receptors and how the cells deal with noise that could send them astray.